Investigations Summary and
Timeline
Summary:
The timeline below consists of factual information,
including dates and sources of information concerning events that have
transpired around the attempts to enforce the law to restrict post-viable abortions
passed in 1998. Ten years later, this timeline demonstrates how legal
maneuvers by those with money and/or power can virtually prevent enforcement of
a law. While the timeline seems lengthy and detailed, it really includes only
actual legal actions taken by all interested parties in relation to this post-viable
abortion law. It is well worth the time it takes to read the entire timeline
in order to better understand why the peoplearewatching.com website was
launched and why the question is being asked “Is Tiller Above the Law?”
Timeline: (Below is a partial timeline. It will be
completed in the near future as dates and sources are documented.)
May 2, 1998—Capital-Journal—Gov. Bill Graves signed a bill
to significantly restrict post-viable and partial-birth abortions.
May 1998—Capital-Journal—Controversy erupted among lawmakers
and government officials about whether the new abortion law contained an
exception for the mental health of a pregnant woman.
June 6, 1998—Capital-Journal—Tiller filed a lawsuit with the
Kansas Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the new post-viable
abortion law and whether or not it includes an exception for the mental health
of a pregnant woman. The lawsuit also challenges the reporting requirements in
the statute which require doctors to detail the reasons for post-viable
abortions in reports filed with the Kansas Department of Health and Environment
because submitting the reports could violate Tiller’s constitutional right
against self-incrimination. The records could be used as the basis for
criminal prosecution and licensing revocation procedures.
July 1, 1998—The new post-viable abortion ban goes into
effect.
July 10, 1998—Capital-Journal—Tiller filed a motion seeking
to keep the law, which all but prohibits post-viability abortions, from taking
effect until after the case is decided by the Kansas Supreme Court. The court
announced it will decide whether to consider the case in August or September.
July 18, 1998—Associated Press—Tiller angered lawmakers by
deciding to start performing partial-birth abortions which he says is a way for
him to legally perform post-viable abortions under the 1998 abortion law.
Attorney General Carla Stovall refused to seek an injunction against Tiller
deferring to the Kansas Board of Healing Arts to make a determination on
whether the law was broken. The board said it would investigate if it receives
a complaint, but no complaint has been filed.
July 21, 1998—Capital-Journal—Gov. Bill Graves and Attorney
General Carla Stovall requested that the Kansas Board of Healing Arts
investigate whether Tiller is performing partial-birth abortions and to take
appropriate actions based on any violations of the law.
July 23, 1998—Associated Press—Tiller emphatically denied
any legal wrongdoing in a letter to the Board of Healing Arts which will be
investigating whether Tiller performed partial-birth abortions and if he has
violated the law.
July 26, 1998—Associated Press—According to unpublished
figures obtained from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, of the
11,507 abortions performed in Kansas in 1997, 4,973 involved out-of-state
residents. A comparison with 1996 shows a sharp increase in Kansas
abortions—particularly for out-of-state women. The number of abortions
increased by 326 from 1996 to 1997, but the number of abortions for nonresident
women grew by more than 606, state statistics show.
July 31, 1998—Associated Press—A 12-year-old girl from Michigan allegedly impregnated by her brother had a post-viable abortion in Wichita at George Tiller’s clinic according to an attorney for her parents. The girl was
29 weeks pregnant, or late in her seventh month. She was involved in a highly
publicized legal battle to obtain the abortion. Abortion is illegal in Michigan after the 24th week unless the woman’s life is endangered.
August 1, 1998—Capital-Journal—Tiller filed a petition with
the Kansas Board of Healing Arts challenging its subpoena of his abortion
records. A petition to modify or limit the subpoena was filed asserting that
the subpoena and a complaint that Tiller’s attorney said was filed by Gov. Bill
Graves are vague and indefinite and require clarification. The petition also
asked the board for its interpretation of the new law, particularly the exceptions
to it and whether it allows post-viability abortions to preserve the mental
health of the mother.
August 11, 1998—Associated Press—Tiller filed a petition
asking the state Board of Healing Arts to “modify and-or limit the subpoena” it
issued for his records of post-viable abortions he has performed recently. The
board is asking for “any and all records” from July 1 through August 3 dealing
with abortions performed where the gestational age of the fetus was more than
22 weeks. The petition noted that there are different interpretations of the
law and that Gov. Graves request for the board to investigate Tiller dealt with
partial birth abortions while the subpoena from the board dealt with all post-viable
abortions.
August 16, 1998—Capital-Journal—The Board of Healing Arts
reached an agreement with George Tiller concerning subpoenas for post-viable
abortion records by the board so it can investigate whether Tiller has violated
the law. The board announced it will cancel the hearing for Tiller’s petition
to modify the subpoenas noting Tiller had indicated a desire to cooperate but
was concerned for the privacy of his patients. Larry Buening, the board’s
executive director, declined to release details of the agreement, noting that
information regarding board investigations isn’t public unless charges are
filed.
October 1, 1998—Capital-Journal—The Kansas Supreme Court
dismissed a lawsuit filed by George Tiller challenging the constitutionality of
a new law restricting post-viable abortions. The court also refused Tiller’s
request to block enforcement of the law until questions about its
constitutionality are resolved. The court has a long held policy that it will
not issue advisory opinions. Hours later, the Board of Healing Arts announced
it would not pursue disciplinary action against Tiller after a three month
investigation determined he wasn’t violating the law by performing post-viable
abortions, including one on a 12-year-old girl from Michigan.
October 9, 1998—Capital-Journal—Kansans for Life sent a
letter to Attorney General Carla Stovall urging her to investigate allegations
that Tiller is performing procedures that violate the new post-viable abortion
law. Copies of the letter were also sent to Gov. Bill Graves and Sedgwick
County District Attorney Nola Foulston. The governor’s office said the
question has already been decided by the Board of Healing Arts. Anti-abortion
lawmakers are expected to try to tighten the loopholes in the law in the next
legislative session.
October 18, 1998—Capital-Journal—Attorney General Carla
Stovall sent a letter to Kansans for Life informing them that she will not file
charges against Tiller or initiate an investigation of him stating that she had
no hard evidence that he had committed a crime. Stovall cited the results of
the recent investigation by the Board of Healing Arts to support her position.
Leaders from Kansans for Life pointed out that news accounts of a 12-year-old Michigan girl coming to Tiller for a post-viable abortion are evidence of violation of the
law.
November 18, 1998—Associated Press—A legislative committee
recommended that lawmakers rewrite state law next year to narrow the reasons
for allowing certain post-viable abortion practices in light of disagreements
on how to enforce the law by government agencies, legislators and other
interested parties.
January 28, 1999—Capital-Journal—Legislation was introduced
in the Kansas Senate to allow a woman to obtain a post-viable abortion if it
were necessary to preserve her mental health. Anti-abortion lawmakers don’t
want the mental health exception because they believe it would allow post-viable
abortions for almost any reason.
April 7, 1999—Associated Press—The Kansas House will be
debating a bill that would change the state’s post-viable abortion law.
Supporters of the bill say it will reduce the use of all types of post-viable
abortions, including partial-birth abortions, and will not allow a mental
health exception. Opponents are concerned that the bill will be unconstitutional
without the mental health exception.
April 27, 1999—Associated Press—Prospects of enacting a new post-viable
abortion law this year are dim due to divergent views by legislators of how to
fix the law. Many lawmakers contend the law led to more partial-birth
abortions because of the mental health exemption. Department of Health and
Environment statistics for 1998 show 58 partial-birth abortions were performed
in Kansas compared to none in 1997. The woman’s mental health was listed as
the reason for all 58.
The Kansas legislature failed to pass any new late-term
abortion law in the 1999 session.
September 2, 1999—Associated Press—The Arizona Supreme Court
ruled that a 14-year-old girl could undergo an abortion outside Arizona even though she is believed to be 24 weeks pregnant. Arizona law doesn’t allow
abortions after a fetus is viable and no Arizona clinics perform abortions past
the 20 week mark. It is believed the girl is seeking an abortion in Kansas.
The Kansas legislature failed to pass any new post-viable
abortion law in the 2000 session due to a lack of consensus between the House,
Senate and the governor’s office concerning the mental health exception
loophole.
March 29, 2001—Associated Press—Nearly half the women who
had abortions in Kansas last year were from other states. The Kansas
Department of Health and Environment reported that of 12,323 induced abortions
last year in the state, 6,352 of the women were Kansas residents and 5,971 were
from elsewhere. Of the 639 abortions performed after 22 weeks of pregnancy, 59
were performed on Kansans, and 580 were on women from other states.
Legislators on both sides of the abortion debate were troubled by the
statistics on women who receive second, third and fourth abortions. According
to the report, 37.3 percent of the abortions in Kansas last year were performed
on women who had undergone a previous abortion.
(The timeline from 2001 to 2007 will be available soon
when documentation is complete.)
In August of 2007, Kansans for Life gathered 6,954
signatures of registered voters on a petition to convene a grand jury to look
into violations of Kansas law banning post-viable abortions.
November 29, 2007—Kansas Supreme Court Order—On October 19, 2007, George Tiller filed a petition naming Judge Michael Corrigan and Judge
Paul Buchanan as respondents challenging the legality of grand jury proceedings
which were scheduled to commence on October 30, 2007. With the petition was a motion to stay the grand jury proceedings until the court considers the
petition. On October 26, 2007, the court granted the motion to stay the grand
jury. The respondents filed their answers on November 16, 2007. Having considered the petition, responses, and the record before the court, the court
determined that the petition should be denied and the case dismissed. The
motion to stay the grand jury was lifted.
In October of 2007, Kansans for Life turned in nearly
8,000 signatures to the Board of Healing Arts asking for a complete
investigation of Tiller and to overhaul its policy on oversight of post-viable
abortions.
January 8, 2008—Wichita Eagle--The citizen-petitioned grand
jury is impaneled to begin the investigation of George Tiller’s post-viable
abortion practices. Kansans for Life called for a special prosecutor instead
of District Attorney Nola Foulston’s office. The grand jury has 15 members who
will serve a 3 month term which can be extended if needed. Chief District
Judge Michael Corrigan will oversee the process. Retired Sedgwick County Chief
Judge Paul Buchanan will select and instruct the grand jury, provide legal
opinions when asked and supervise.
January 2008—Wichita Eagle—The grand jury heard testimony
from David Gittrich of Kansans for Life and Troy Newman of Operation Rescue.
Tiller’s attorneys denounced the grand jury investigation contending it has
been “poisoned” by the testimonies.
January 24, 2008—Wichita Eagle—Judge Buchanan ordered Tiller
to turn over the records subpoenaed by the grand jury after Tiller’s attorneys
argued to quash the subpoenas. The grand jury had asked for names and
addresses for employees and physicians who performed abortions, names of
physicians who offered services as referring physicians and information on
counseling services at Tiller’s facility along with patient records.
January 29,2008—Wichita Eagle—Two subpoenas were issued last
week for records of some 2,000 women who sought abortions over the past five
years who were over 21 weeks pregnant. The records were to be redacted (all
names and identifying information was to be removed) and are due by February 1.
January 28, 2008—Tiller’s attorneys filed a motion to stop
or limit the production of patient records for the grand jury.
January 31, 2008—Wichita Eagle—Judge Buchanan rejected
Tiller’s attorneys motion to stop production of patient records and ordered
Tiller to turn over the records with “all deliberate speed”. Lee Thompson told
Judge Buchanan he will file an immediate appeal to the Kansas Supreme Court.
February 1, 2008—Wichita Eagle—Tiller’s attorneys will
appear today before Judge Buchanan to seek further privacy protections on the
subpoenaed abortion records. They also are rushing to appeal to the Kansas
Supreme Court to quash the subpoenas for records and to disband the grand jury.
February 6, 2008—Wichita Eagle—The Kansas Supreme Court
postponed the subpoenas of records. Chief Justice Kay McFarland said it raises
“significant issues” of patient privacy and a grand jury’s authority to issue
subpoenas.
February 6, 2008—Wichita Eagle—Kansas Supreme Court agreed
to Tiller’s demand to halt all medical record transfers requested by the grand
jury. Chief Justice Kay McFarland said it raises “significant issues” of
patient privacy and a grand jury’s authority to issue subpoenas. The Court
also required grand jury judges (Buchanan and Corrigan) to submit a written
objection to the Court’s intervention by February 11. In addition, they will
need to submit a written rebuttal by February 25 to Tiller’s “mandamus”
(demand) that the grand jury be disbanded altogether. The Center for
Reproductive Rights also filed a petition with the Court seeking to quash the
subpoenas based on privacy issues.
February 7, 2008—Wichita Eagle—Two subpoenas were served on
February 5 to Attorney General Stephen Six by the grand jury. One seeks
records of 60 patients from Tiller’s clinic in the possession of the Attorney
General’s office. The other seeks copies of testimony provided to the Attorney
General’s office from another physician who provided a second opinion for some
of Tiller’s post-viable abortion patients. Six said he is responding to the
testimony request but is evaluating his response to the records request based
on the Kansas Supreme Court’s order to block the grand jury subpoenas for
records.
February 16, 2008—Wichita Eagle—Attorney General Stephen Six
asked the Kansas Supreme Court to quash the subpoena requesting records of 60
patients from Tiller’s clinic in the possession of the Attorney General’s
office as part of an earlier investigation. Six said the records are covered
by the Kansas Supreme Court’s order to postpone them.
February 20, 2008—Wichita Eagle—The Kansas Supreme Court
ruled to delay the enforcement of a subpoena of records from Attorney General
Stephen Six’s office. Tiller’s attorneys are also arguing that the
citizen-petitioned grand jury is unconstitutional because it interferes with
the law enforcement powers of the executive branch (under which the Attorney
General’s office operates).
March 1, 2008—Wichita Eagle—The Kansas Supreme Court said it
will hear arguments on April 8 in three cases challenging subpoenas for patient
records from Tiller’s clinic. It also kept its order blocking enforcement of
the subpoenas and ordered the two judges handling the grand jury proceedings
not to issue any additional subpoenas for patient records. It is rare for the
court to have a special session like this for a single case. The grand jury’s
90 day life is due to expire on April 8 also, unless the overseeing judges
extend it.
April 2, 2008—Associated Press—Tiller’s attorneys asked the Sedgwick County court to admonish grand jurors investigating Tiller to avoid advertisements
including the “Is Tiller above the Law? peoplearewatching.com” billboard and
radio ads from pro-life groups. Judge Paul Buchanan denied the motion saying
Tiller lacked standing to raise the argument.
Week of April 1-4, 2008—Wichita Eagle--Judge Paul Buchanan
extended the grand jury term by an additional 90 days until July 7.
April 9, 2008—Wichita Eagle—The Kansas Supreme Court heard
arguments from all sides yesterday in a rare special session as it considered
Tiller’s request to block a grand jury’s request for medical records.
April 22, 2008—Wichita Eagle—Gov. Kathleen Sebelius vetoed a
bill aimed at strengthening post-viable abortion laws. Pro-life legislators
are planning to attempt to override the veto during the wrap-up session April
30. The bill would allow family members of a woman to sue if they thought a
doctor had performed or was about to perform an illegal post-viable abortion,
would help prevent coerced abortions (especially for minors that may be victims
of abuse), would increase the information women had before an abortion, would
increase reporting on KDHE forms, and would help district attorneys and the
attorney general in prosecuting reported violations of the law.
After several attempts to override the veto of Gov.
Sebelius, the legislature was unable to pass any new post-viable abortion law
in the 2008 session.
May 7, 2008—Wichita Eagle—The Kansas Supreme Court
unanimously ruled that the citizen-petitioned grand jury is constitutional and
can proceed with its investigation of abortion provider, Dr. George Tiller.
They also declined to quash or modify the subpoenas issued by the grand jury.
But it sent the case back to district court and set guidelines for the
presiding judge to use to determine if and how the subpoenas should be
enforced. The guidelines instruct the judge to consider the competing
interests of the state and the patients in deciding how patient records are
released to the grand jury.
May 9, 2008—Wichita Eagle—The Sedgwick County district judge
overseeing the grand jury, Judge Paul Buchanan, said that a citizens grand jury
investigating George Tiller may have to issue new subpoenas for patient
records. Prosecutor Ann Swegle of the Sedgwick County District Attorney’s
Office, who is advising the grand jury, told the judge the panel would agree to
seek a sampling of 50 records per year for the past five years. Buchanan said
he would privately meet with Swegle to determine the scope of the grand jury
investigation, before deciding which records were relevant to the inquiry.